age of romance
Have you ever wondered, during your grandparents' time was there romance? To put it simpler, did your grannies have romance?
I myself don't really believe there was any. If we look at the kind of society it was back then, the family was the basic unit for procreation. Procreation was a way to increase the economic workforce for the family. During such harsh time did they really have the luxury to think of romance? I don't think so~ Somemore the culture back then was very much male chauvinistic, so the social/domestic status of females was far from being equal to males. In Chinese there is a saying, 嫁鸡随鸡, 嫁狗随狗, which means if you are married to a chicken, then you follow the chicken; if you are married to a dog, then you follow the dog. There is also another saying 夫唱妇随, which means the husband sings this tune, the wife also must sing the same tune.
I really respect women of that time. Polygyny was common, how did they stand it? They could really keep quiet about their husband marrying another woman? Ermm.. were the males really that greedy? Why? One is not enough? But what's the use of having more than one wife when at the end of the day you would still ignore them.
I feel glad for women of today.
I myself don't really believe there was any. If we look at the kind of society it was back then, the family was the basic unit for procreation. Procreation was a way to increase the economic workforce for the family. During such harsh time did they really have the luxury to think of romance? I don't think so~ Somemore the culture back then was very much male chauvinistic, so the social/domestic status of females was far from being equal to males. In Chinese there is a saying, 嫁鸡随鸡, 嫁狗随狗, which means if you are married to a chicken, then you follow the chicken; if you are married to a dog, then you follow the dog. There is also another saying 夫唱妇随, which means the husband sings this tune, the wife also must sing the same tune.
I really respect women of that time. Polygyny was common, how did they stand it? They could really keep quiet about their husband marrying another woman? Ermm.. were the males really that greedy? Why? One is not enough? But what's the use of having more than one wife when at the end of the day you would still ignore them.
I feel glad for women of today.
5 Comments:
they could have made a big noise abt their husband having more than a wife, but they really couldn't do anything about it. It's a social norm, common practice that a husband can have more than 1 wife and majority of others don't really see what's wrong with it. Even the women, after they have accepted this as how it must/could be...
if they made big fuss abt e whole matter, then they wld probably b deemed unsuitable to be married into the family because they are very... troublesome, which is definitely not what a traditional chi fam wants in a daughter-in-law. Plus the woman's reputation wld b destroyed then that wld decrease her chances of finding another husband... and it isn't nice at tat time to be single after a certain age... it sure isn't nice now either.
By Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 10:34:00 AM
come to think of it, there wasn't thing like divorce in old days right? Even marriage to a non-virgin seemed to be a disgrace last time, let alone remarriage.
Nowadays there are divorce. On the bright side it just means people want the best out of their relationship.
By chillycraps, at 12/15/2005 11:57:00 AM
think there are divorces, but it's not something to be glamorized...
yar, don't think remarriage seems like a good idea at that time either..
By Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 12:00:00 PM
I think people simply made more of an effort in the past. A relationship cannot be sustained simply by love...
By Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 10:50:00 PM
or could it be, people in the past were too busy with making ends meet, that they didn't have the luxury to think of love?
Maybe the relationship was sustained more by the common goal of raising the children.
By chillycraps, at 12/15/2005 10:55:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home